
Strategically, it would seem necessary to keep Game B activities out of view of the Game A players until Game B is strong enough to resist an attack from Game A motivated folks (ideally, until Game B is anti-fragile).
Due to the world view of those of us in Game A, we are likely to see Game B as an existential threat. In Game A, there is a logical reaction to a process that represents an existential threat. So, it would be bad to trigger that reaction too early in the development of Game B.
submitted by /u/phrapachino
[link] [comments]
Tagged with :