The Liminal Learning Portal

@noonessleep Yes, very readable

@ianmcorbin1 Yes, Joe Sachs, from his intro to the book.

@Tetrazphere1 Indeed

“Exclusively discursive thinking that could separate and combine, but could never contemplate anything whole, would be an empty algebra, a formalism that could not be applied to anything. In human thinking, at any rate, the activities of reasoning and contemplation are rarely… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

“Everything in the Tractatus, I came to realize,—the musical cadence, its logical system of ‘the world,’ the say/show itself distinction, the remarks on timelessness, the mystical, silence, etc.—begins to fall into its proper place once the work is seen in its function as a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Adam Robbert retweeted: “I wish you had seen him . . .”

“I wish you had seen him . . .”

Writing should be as simple as possible, but as detailed as necessary.

@jim_rutt Parking garage to the business park by my place (during business hours). It’s been like this for ~2.5 years now. Unsure how any of this comes back.

The gathering together of sources that inform a manuscript is never a rational activity alone. It is also and substantially an aesthetic one. The curation of the right voices and perspectives is an art form in itself.