Curating Content To Support Learning About Humanity's Transition

The Liminal Learning Portal

This content was posted on  5 Jul 20  by   Brent Cooper  on  Medium
Okay, let’s talk then.

Okay, let’s talk then. You can defend yourself, but you shouldn’t try to defend Integral as a whole, the majority of the online community has been totally moderate/ centrist which is progressive in speech only, and even then barely so. They have been pro-IDW and anti-left, anti- Bernie, and in effect, or directly, anti- social justice.

At any rate, I am describing the fact of a split within Integral, into a social justice part, and are more corporatist side. If wannabe ‘Integralists’ like David Fuller waste 3 years being anti-social justice and sucking up to Jordan Peterson, saying the IDW is Integral, then Integral has a big problem, and metamodernism has a clear advantage. I don’t know why you would even try to argue with this, but I’m happy to discuss.

About MM via Hanzi or in my work you are just projecting, making a pre/trans fallacy, asking me for proof. MM is more complex than there is space for in this article, and it is a worldview that is more innate to me and my background as I’ve been developing it for a long time. So, you have to acknowledge what I’m saying about lazy Integralists here trying to co-opt and mashup their undeveloped theories (reliance on things like SD, etc..) with this new term metamodernism.

Scroll to Top