Curating Content To Support Learning About Humanity's Transition

This content was posted on  14 Jul 21  by   Cognitive Edge  on  Website
Comment on Maps or charts? by Pierre

How do dark constraints factor in? Are these capable of being mapped or is it only the effects? Perhaps a chart throws up hypotheses about what lies beneath, based on the patterns detected at the surface based on experience of similar terrain or seas in other locations where studies have been undertaken. Once more data is gathered, what lies underneath can be explored further. Senge’s iceberg model comes to mind, recognizing the problems with Senge’s five disciplines (of the holy grail of Senge discipleship!) , but in terms of the patterns that sit above the water line. Is there still a place for maps where more ambiguity can be useful?

Scroll to Top