@sensefulronin @Hugh_Davison @Jonathan_Rowson oh thank you… yes…:-)

@TomAsacker The tracks=unsafe. The chemicals = toxic. The company is a for profit enterprise = losses. The press =failed The politicians backed the company The EPA… oh my god. The people, their pets, their grandchildren… Who will pay the health care in 3 yrs? Air, water, soil, wildlife-

@JLydiaHenshaw the department aspect of this post is irony.

@blakeyfrench yes

Profit based success measurements make maintenance a cost instead of a necessity. When maintenance fails the consequences are no longer in the same context. This makes it difficult to address the complexity. The consequences of consequences. There is no department for that.

There will be no sense of community before the polarities and the fractures become new learning. First we learn to commune– then we make community (of learning). #WarmData

@jim_rutt yes indeed.

@jim_rutt And, as ‘adults’ — Can the next generations be treated with the integrity and generosity they need to meet this changing world?

@MetabolicRiff @systemsdesign @johncutlefish parts and wholes… decontextualized bits.

@enrichedbycode No.. just let us know. 😀