Got access to Claude today (an older invite expired unused, alas) . On my test question it hallucinated much worse that GPT3.5 about on par with Bard, 9 wrong out of 10: Who are the 10 most prominent guests on the Jim Rutt Show podcast? 📷 Here are the 10 most prominent… Quoted feed from […]
Got access to Claude today (an older invite expired unused, alas) . On my … Read More »
Interesting chat today with @C4COMPUTATION about the possibility of LLMs being able to automate more deeply into the tech-stack in ways that are generally not cost-effective for humans. What if we had LLMs that could quickly and cheaply custom program FPGAs and/or GPUs for our… twitter.com/i/web/status/164…
in cognitive science there is a distinction (not necessarily true at the neural level) between episodic and declarative memories. Episodic such as memory of your eating breakfast yesterday. Declarative memory “what is the capital of France; Paris”
and they make great cheese in Vermont which may be merely coincidental but perhaps not!
and they make great cheese in Vermont which may be merely coincidental but perhaps not! Read More »
Financing documentation is another. And those expensive typists: lawyers (or cut-n-pasters charging at typing rates)
So we already know that GPT3.5 and above are damn good at high level language computer programming (Python, C, SQL etc) . What other affordances might LLMs be able to compositionally orchestrate?
So we already know that GPT3.5 and above are damn good at high level language … Read More »
In the mammalian memory stack there is also perceptual memory on the order of 80 millisecs. Serves to stitch things into a continuity and provides the low level basis for prediction.
In the mammalian memory stack there is also perceptual memory on the order of 80 … Read More »
